Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 24, 2025, 10:14:07 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 13   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Hypermotard 796  (Read 39754 times)
kingbaby
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2364



« Reply #135 on: October 06, 2009, 09:54:21 AM »

Good suspension... bad suspension...  I can't get past owning a bike being tagged as a "minitard".
Hell, might as well just call it a "weetard"  laughingdp

 
Logged

I promise to make better mistakes tomorrow.
mitt
Flounder-Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4378


2003 M1000s


WWW
« Reply #136 on: October 06, 2009, 10:09:15 AM »

the new monsters suspension is progressive from the geometry not the spring rates.

Without a 4 bar linkage, they aren't progressive like a super bike or older monster suspension. 

Logged

junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #137 on: October 06, 2009, 10:16:46 AM »

I didn't notice until now the new monsters don't have progressive rear suspension (the extra links and pivots) - another cost reduction.  Seems the 'tards are almost a more similar replacement for the older monsters from a frame and suspension standpoint.


mitt

Can you explain the differences and advantages disadvantages between the linked, progressive systems, and what the newer monsters have (would that be "direct"?) ?


This interests me.
Logged

Goat_Herder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1775



« Reply #138 on: October 06, 2009, 11:01:52 AM »

Good suspension... bad suspension...  I can't get past owning a bike being tagged as a "minitard".
Hell, might as well just call it a "weetard"  laughingdp

  

It's "Wee Tar Did".  laughingdp
Logged

Goat Herder (Tony)
2003 Ducati Monster 620 - Yellow SOLD
2007 Ducati Monster S2R1000 - Black KILLED
2007 Ducati Monster S2R1000 - Red
mitt
Flounder-Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4378


2003 M1000s


WWW
« Reply #139 on: October 06, 2009, 02:40:47 PM »

Can you explain the differences and advantages disadvantages between the linked, progressive systems, and what the newer monsters have (would that be "direct"?) ?


I am not an expert on them, but it deals with the fact that the more the wheel travels, the faster the shock compresses, so that a big bump gets a different spring and damper rate.  The traditional geometry like new monsters, old supersports, and sport classics you can't change the rate drastically since the geometry doesn't change a lot.

from a google search, here is a good visual of one 4 bar design (I think a honda design that they "stole" from ducati just before the 999 bikes came out):


http://www.atnet.it/lista/casuni.htm

Lever Ratio (or suspension ratio): the incremental ratio of the Wheel Travel divided by the incremental ratio of the Shock Travel; so that it expresses the increase of the wheel displacement, respect to the increase of the Shock absorber stroke




mitt
Logged

hbliam
Guest
« Reply #140 on: October 06, 2009, 05:56:16 PM »

Roll Eyes Too difficult for you to keep up?

Yeah, that's it. I'm an idiot for asking guys to keep a Hyper thread about Hypers.

I usually don't care if threads take a slight detour but this 696 suspension tangent deserves it's own thread.
Logged
kopfjäger
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 33197


Feral 859


WWW
« Reply #141 on: October 06, 2009, 07:43:30 PM »


I usually don't care if threads take a slight detour...

Well thank you for that.  Cheesy
Logged

“Woohoohoohoo! Two personal records! For breath holding and number of sharks shot in the frickin\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Raux
Guest
« Reply #142 on: October 06, 2009, 09:02:25 PM »

I am not an expert on them, but it deals with the fact that the more the wheel travels, the faster the shock compresses, so that a big bump gets a different spring and damper rate.  The traditional geometry like new monsters, old supersports, and sport classics you can't change the rate drastically since the geometry doesn't change a lot.


the angle that the new monster shock is mounted helps as the angle of the shock to the moving swingarm does change. therefore changing the geometry.
 
the sportclassic are almost in line with the arc of the suspension travel therefore continuous rate.
Logged
Dave R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 410



WWW
« Reply #143 on: October 06, 2009, 09:44:16 PM »

the angle that the new monster shock is mounted helps as the angle of the shock to the moving swingarm does change. therefore changing the geometry.
 
the sportclassic are almost in line with the arc of the suspension travel therefore continuous rate.
Quote
this is correct..  the wheel can only move straight up and down. The shock mounted at the angle like the 696/1100 allows it to get  progressively stiffer as the angle of the shock becomes more horizontal.

Disregard!!  once again I got sucked in by Raux  Cool  I will most this responde somewhere else..  drink
« Last Edit: October 06, 2009, 09:45:56 PM by Dave R » Logged

Dave R
Seattle Used Bikes
SALES - SERVICE - ACCESSORIES - PARTS
Facebook
Web
mitt
Flounder-Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4378


2003 M1000s


WWW
« Reply #144 on: October 07, 2009, 04:26:14 AM »


I usually don't care if threads take a slight detour but this 696 suspension tangent deserves it's own thread.

If you read, we are comparing the tard suspension versus 696/1100 versus old M1000/s4r suspension, not talking just about 696 suspension. 

mitt
Logged

mitt
Flounder-Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4378


2003 M1000s


WWW
« Reply #145 on: October 07, 2009, 04:28:06 AM »

the angle that the new monster shock is mounted helps as the angle of the shock to the moving swingarm does change. therefore changing the geometry.
 

I said the new monster changes a little.  A 4 bar sbk suspension changes drastically.  Time for some CAD layouts and graphs...

mitt
Logged

junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #146 on: October 07, 2009, 05:15:06 AM »

i love graphs!

AND charts!

see http://www.jamphat.com/rap/
Logged

mitt
Flounder-Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4378


2003 M1000s


WWW
« Reply #147 on: October 07, 2009, 02:46:18 PM »

i love graphs!

AND charts!

see http://www.jamphat.com/rap/

I don't have a .mpg of the motions, but here are the charts and models:

http://sites.google.com/site/mittelstadtc/Home/engineering/motorcycle-rear-suspension

mitt
Logged

junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #148 on: October 07, 2009, 02:54:29 PM »

Wow. that's very cool to see. Especially after having taken the ol' kinematics and dynamic machines class in college.
Logged

Monstermonkey
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #149 on: October 07, 2009, 05:15:15 PM »

BTW, my Hyper was $10,400 because the dealer sold it as a demo bike because it had 30 miles on it!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 13   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1