It's no monster, but it's naked

Started by misfitbiker, May 28, 2008, 08:46:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

misfitbiker


Mduc

I like the funky look of it. Would love to see it in person and take a test ride on it.  ;D
07 S2R1K

Pancake81

About the same time you're dragging your knees through a series of tight left-right-handers on Sunday afternoon, some guy in white shoes is sweating a 3-foot putt. Go figure.

VisceralReaction

I remember reading about the first prototype and the fuel tank had like 40000psi between your legs.
That made me nervous in a crash of any type
There are squirrels juggling knives in my head

Smiling End

Wow, the display is nuts.  I don't like the sound of super narrow tires though.  Wouldn't that have some effect on speed?
99 M750 Dark

jagstang

That looks pretty cool- provided it worked well, I'd take chance on one.
'09 1100

CougarSlayer

When gas gets to 100 a gallon I am sure there will be plenty to go around or not enough and everyone looking to get one.

-panthro

cc's are still 992

fasterblkduc

Atomic Racing
Zalusky Advanced Riding School Lead instructor
2010 partners:
Komodo Gear, Motorex, Studio299, Moto Primo, Caztek, Chickenhawk

eyeboy

Quote from: ducatizzzz on October 23, 2008, 05:13:21 PMObfuscate! Obfuscate!

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room.

There is nothing noble in being superior to some other man.  The true nobility is in being superior to your previous self. And in bacon. 

JWG

I have no idea what you are talking about....

Anti - New World Order

ODrides

Companies keep making hydrogren vehicles instead of trying to develop a better way to make HYDROGEN!  Right now it takes more engergy to make hydrogen than you get out of it -- fuel efficient?  No.  Having said that, it looks cool.

eyeboy

Quote from: ODrides on May 28, 2008, 12:49:00 PM
Companies keep making hydrogren vehicles instead of trying to develop a better way to make HYDROGEN!  Right now it takes more engergy to make hydrogen than you get out of it -- fuel efficient?  No.  Having said that, it looks cool.

a bit like ethanol no? i mean it's worse for the environment than gas?

oh, sorry...

/threadjack
Quote from: ducatizzzz on October 23, 2008, 05:13:21 PMObfuscate! Obfuscate!

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room.

There is nothing noble in being superior to some other man.  The true nobility is in being superior to your previous self. And in bacon. 

triangleforge

Quote from: VisceralReaction on May 28, 2008, 10:25:04 AM
I remember reading about the first prototype and the fuel tank had like 40000psi between your legs.
That made me nervous in a crash of any type

Well, like duh -- that's why it's got an EJECTOR SEAT!   ;D

By hammer and hand all arts do stand.
2000 Cagiva Gran Canyon

acalles

its actually kind of cool looking..

but, I worry about how quiet it will be...

ODrides

Quote from: eyeboy on May 28, 2008, 01:02:36 PM
a bit like ethanol no? i mean it's worse for the environment than gas?

oh, sorry...

/threadjack

I'm not sure about ethanol's numbers, but the whole idea of ethanol is to ease our dependence on foreign oil.  Is hydrogen worse for the environment than gasoline?  There's a lot of factors to consider.  If you use electricity to remove oxygen from water molecules to create hydrogen that will then be turned back into water (and energy to propel a fuel cell vehicle, say), you're getting less energy from the hydrogen than went into creating it.  And if you're burning coal to create that electricity, then you'd have a strong argument that hydrogen is more for the environment than gasoline.  Thread sufficiently jacked!