Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 06, 2025, 01:24:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Torque/Anti-reversion cones  (Read 4447 times)
WetDuc
AKA iamhybris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 653



« on: February 15, 2010, 03:22:46 AM »

Nothing came up on the forum search and this seems kind of interesting to me.
The guys riding Harleys have a ton of threads about it.
They slip on at your header pipes and narrow the radius in a small section to increase the backpressure.  Maybe would need some pipe fitment on a duc?  Won't work with the desmo?http://www.lachoppers.com/catalog/display/1178/index.html
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5165231/description.html
« Last Edit: February 15, 2010, 03:26:34 AM by iamhybris » Logged

2007 S2R1000, 2009 M696 & 2008 M695 (foster bikes)
battlecry
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669


On a silver black phantom bike...


« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2010, 06:28:11 AM »


The patent application is interesting in that they are indicating a one way valve on the exhaust would be beneficial.

The reverse flow they claim to eliminate seems to me to be the negative portion of a sound wave.  Can't see that happening.  It is as if you could develop a diode or a rectifier for a sound wave.

If their bikes run better with more backpressure, perhaps they needed tuning to begin with?

My two cents...
Logged
ID_DUC_MON
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 123



« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2010, 08:43:41 AM »

I ran them on the Sportster tuner bike I built many years ago. They come about due to the trend of HD guys using really short open pipes and thus having lack of back pressure. For performance, they do not as good of a job as two-into-one pipes do but with some jetting you can get acceptable values and safe scavenging for the valves. Essentially they work for those wanting to have the chopped custom exhaust and are willing to sacrifice a bit of the performance.
Logged
Bill in OKC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 897


S4Rs


« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2010, 09:21:56 AM »

There have been anti reversion headers for cars for a long time - 25+ years.  Maybe it is something that can be measured on a dyno? 
Logged

'07 S4Rs  '02 RSVR  '75 GT550  '13 FXSB  '74 H1E  '71 CB750
Raux
Guest
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2010, 10:00:25 AM »

There have been anti reversion headers for cars for a long time - 25+ years.  Maybe it is something that can be measured on a dyno? 

my same thought. this is nothing new. basically looks like this

_____
    ___\______
<exhaust       engine>
    __________
______/

and you put it at equal distance from each cylinder
the distance is the tuning part     
Logged
rockaduc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1045



« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2010, 04:18:23 PM »

I ran them on the Sportster tuner bike I built many years ago. They come about due to the trend of HD guys using really short open pipes and thus having lack of back pressure. For performance, they do not as good of a job as two-into-one pipes do but with some jetting you can get acceptable values and safe scavenging for the valves. Essentially they work for those wanting to have the chopped custom exhaust and are willing to sacrifice a bit of the performance.

If you are buying a Harely, do you really care about performance? Roll Eyes
Logged

If you can see Chuck Norris, he can see you.  If you can't see Chuck Norris, you may be only seconds away from death.
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2010, 05:24:59 PM »

Well, I think they care about "relative performance" - that performance of the bike in stock form, compared to short pipes, compared to full length "tuned" pipes. Relative for their bikes, not compared to the latest, greatest litre bike.
Logged

scott_araujo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1593


« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2010, 02:35:13 PM »

If their bikes run better with more backpressure, perhaps they needed tuning to begin with?

My two cents...

Agreed.  I think most Harley exhausts are made more for sound than smooth running or power.

Scott
Logged
ID_DUC_MON
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 123



« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2010, 03:33:14 PM »

Agreed.  I think most Harley exhausts are made more for sound than smooth running or power.

Scott

Sure, but then why do we end up spending huge piles of clams for aftermarket pipes/cans, K&N kits, Power Commanders and the such. There is factory performance and tuned performance. Stock, HD's run just fine; but then stock is boring. It is the open pipes that aren't offering the needed back pressure.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1