Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 22, 2025, 02:48:19 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Please Help
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Damned 796 vs 696  (Read 22872 times)
Edward_Wolf
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89


I will always ride a Ducati


« on: April 19, 2010, 06:05:32 PM »

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/04/19/ducati-officially-rolls-out-monster-796-monster-art-customizati/

Damned, they are releasing a new monster, looks better then the 696 (I just bought one in january) and they have a new Art Program for Monster.


Does anyone wanna buy my 696+?Huh???   Wink

Logged

8th - Ducati Streetfighter S (black) '10
7th - Ducati Hypermotard 1100s (Bayliss) '09
6th - Ducati 848 (Martini) '09
5th - Ducati Monster 796 (black) '10
4th - Ducati Monster 696+ (black) '09
3th - BMW R1100R (mistake)
2th - Ducati Monster 600 (Silver) '99
1th - Ducati Monster 600 (Black) '98
hcomp
All this time I wondered what it was like to have a
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 612


Nothing to see here


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2010, 06:47:45 PM »

Derby!

http://ducatimonsterforum.org/index.php?topic=36256.0

Either way, I wish they would give the option to keep the black frame....I'm kinda partial to it now on my 696.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2010, 06:50:15 PM by ryanracer » Logged

にもかかわらず、私の車は本当に速いドライブ、私は女性の生殖器のようなバイクに乗る
muskrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8335



« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2010, 07:23:15 PM »

And the megaphones stayed  bang head i do like the style and the overall aesthetics but the headlight and pipe cross over just don't do it for me.  I bet u money the dealer who sold you the bike knew about the changes 
WTF is wrong with Ducati?
Logged

Can we thin the gene pool? 

2015 MTS 1200
09 Electra Glide
Edward_Wolf
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89


I will always ride a Ducati


« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2010, 07:55:49 PM »

I did send yesterday a mail to my dealer, wondering what they will tell. I asked for a offer to take back my 696+ and sell a new 796 to me. I'll let you know what they will tell.
Logged

8th - Ducati Streetfighter S (black) '10
7th - Ducati Hypermotard 1100s (Bayliss) '09
6th - Ducati 848 (Martini) '09
5th - Ducati Monster 796 (black) '10
4th - Ducati Monster 696+ (black) '09
3th - BMW R1100R (mistake)
2th - Ducati Monster 600 (Silver) '99
1th - Ducati Monster 600 (Black) '98
RC Fan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2010, 11:27:31 PM »

  I bet u money the dealer who sold you the bike knew about the changes 
WTF is wrong with Ducati?

I've got to assume the 696 is on it's way out.  Isn't there like one horsepower difference between the two?
Logged

Cathy

Previous bikes:  2007 Suzuki Bandit 650S & 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Current bikes:  2009 Yamaha XT250 & 2012 Triumph Street Triple R
Edward_Wolf
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89


I will always ride a Ducati


« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2010, 11:38:07 PM »

I've got to assume the 696 is on it's way out.  Isn't there like one horsepower difference between the two?

although the 796 will have some budget aspects, it's still not an entry-level bike. The seat height will be the same 31.9 inches as the 1100 (the 696 is 30.3 inches), and it also gets the five-spoke Marchesini wheels and curvy single-sided swingarm from its big brother. The fork will likely be non-adjustable. Although the 796 motor in the Hypermotard makes just one more horse than the 696, that power comes on much sooner than the 696: the torque peak of 55.7 foot-pounds is at 6250 rpm (just a gear down from highway-cruising rev range), where 50.6 foot-pounds from the 696 appears at 7750 rpm. So the new Monster will take up a niche not seen since the Monster S2R 800 was dropped in 2008: lower pricing and less power than the 1100cc two-valve model, but not as basic or budget-oriented as the entry-level bike.

And i think M696 = 80HP and M796 = 87HP
« Last Edit: April 19, 2010, 11:39:38 PM by Edward_Wolf » Logged

8th - Ducati Streetfighter S (black) '10
7th - Ducati Hypermotard 1100s (Bayliss) '09
6th - Ducati 848 (Martini) '09
5th - Ducati Monster 796 (black) '10
4th - Ducati Monster 696+ (black) '09
3th - BMW R1100R (mistake)
2th - Ducati Monster 600 (Silver) '99
1th - Ducati Monster 600 (Black) '98
RC Fan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2010, 01:54:07 AM »

although the 796 will have some budget aspects, it's still not an entry-level bike. The seat height will be the same 31.9 inches as the 1100 (the 696 is 30.3 inches), and it also gets the five-spoke Marchesini wheels and curvy single-sided swingarm from its big brother. The fork will likely be non-adjustable. Although the 796 motor in the Hypermotard makes just one more horse than the 696, that power comes on much sooner than the 696: the torque peak of 55.7 foot-pounds is at 6250 rpm (just a gear down from highway-cruising rev range), where 50.6 foot-pounds from the 696 appears at 7750 rpm. So the new Monster will take up a niche not seen since the Monster S2R 800 was dropped in 2008: lower pricing and less power than the 1100cc two-valve model, but not as basic or budget-oriented as the entry-level bike.

And i think M696 = 80HP and M796 = 87HP

A beefier front fork would be lovely.
Logged

Cathy

Previous bikes:  2007 Suzuki Bandit 650S & 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Current bikes:  2009 Yamaha XT250 & 2012 Triumph Street Triple R
mikeb
Guest
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2010, 03:20:47 AM »

A beefier front fork would be lovely.

Define beefier. 
Logged
Qfactor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 266


Same shift, different gear.


« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2010, 03:29:15 AM »

probably means stiffer... or better valving?

Q
Logged

"If your mom's got a schlong, run away, she's not your mom...."
RC Fan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2010, 03:31:09 AM »

probably means stiffer... or better valving?

Q

Indeed. 
Logged

Cathy

Previous bikes:  2007 Suzuki Bandit 650S & 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Current bikes:  2009 Yamaha XT250 & 2012 Triumph Street Triple R
mikeb
Guest
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2010, 03:40:57 AM »

probably means stiffer... or better valving?

Q
Indeed. 

How can you tell from the bike description it needs to be stiffer?

Logged
RC Fan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2010, 03:49:05 AM »

How can you tell from the bike description it needs to be stiffer?



I can tell from my 696.  It sounds like the suspension will be carried over.
Logged

Cathy

Previous bikes:  2007 Suzuki Bandit 650S & 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Current bikes:  2009 Yamaha XT250 & 2012 Triumph Street Triple R
mikeb
Guest
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2010, 04:10:34 AM »

I can tell from my 696.  It sounds like the suspension will be carried over.

Probably so.

Have you tried stiffer springs in your 696?  Stiffer forks are an easy fix.
Logged
junior varsity
loves ze desmodromics.
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7355


GT1k, 99 M900(V), 98 M900(W), 00 M900S, 02 748E/R


« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2010, 04:14:29 AM »

Probably so.

Have you tried stiffer springs in your 696?  Stiffer forks are an easy fix.

+1.
WTF is wrong with Ducati?

cry baby owners.
Logged

RC Fan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2010, 04:19:08 AM »

Probably so.

Have you tried stiffer springs in your 696?  Stiffer forks are an easy fix.

I don't have a whole lot of knowledge in the specifics, but I had read that others had tried various solutions, but because of the stock 696 set-up, stiffer springs weren't an option.
Logged

Cathy

Previous bikes:  2007 Suzuki Bandit 650S & 2009 Ducati Monster 696
Current bikes:  2009 Yamaha XT250 & 2012 Triumph Street Triple R
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1