Honestly, I just read it for the articles

r_ciao · September 10, 2010, 06:25:40 AM

Even if one is blind, s/he can enjoy Playboy for the literary content and then some.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_THE_PLAYBOY_READER?SITE=INEVA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

Ciao!

factorPlayer · September 10, 2010, 06:38:49 AM

is that their new safe for the office site?

muskrat · September 10, 2010, 08:07:30 AM

yes, it's safe from a URL standpoint but some of the words might get you in trouble - after all it does say Playboy.

cyrus buelton · September 10, 2010, 08:12:56 AM

The articles in playboy are really good. Their interviews are the best.

If wanted to pay for naked women, I'd buy a different brand magazine or better yet, just use the internet.

The articles in Playboy are very good.

VisceralReaction · September 10, 2010, 09:54:57 AM

Honestly Playboy sucks now. Nothing like it used to be. Now it's directed toward 30 somethings that
are into sports and gaming and movies.
It's nothing like the suave sophistication that it used to portray back in the 70's with short stories
by Asimov and the like.

muskrat · September 10, 2010, 12:58:36 PM

needs more and better pictures too. I canceled my subscription years ago because I didn't find the articles to have a lot of substance, granted I first bought it for the pictures but I quickly tired of the teasing.

VisceralReaction · September 10, 2010, 01:38:42 PM

Yeah speaking of pictures, I was at my GF's house and she had a couple playboys on the back of the toilet
I was thumbing though a christmas issue with Kim Kardashian on the cover.
I was thinking yeah she's hot what's she look like. I flipped through the pictorial and was very disappointed in
the quality of the pictures. I don't know if they were going for a soft focus or what but it was badly out of focus
and the soft filter was dirty or something. it was really bad quality

Porsche Monkey · September 10, 2010, 03:09:59 PM

Quote from: VisceralReaction on September 10, 2010, 01:38:42 PM
Yeah speaking of pictures, I was at my GF's house and she had a couple playboys on the back of the toilet
I was thumbing though a christmas issue with Kim Kardashian on the cover.
I was thinking yeah she's hot what's she look like. I flipped through the pictorial and was very disappointed in
the quality of the pictures. I don't know if they were going for a soft focus or what but it was badly out of focus
and the soft filter was dirty or something. it was really bad quality

Nah that's just Kim

VisceralReaction · September 10, 2010, 03:18:32 PM

IZ_ and dirty?

r_ciao · September 10, 2010, 05:01:51 PM

Quote from: VisceralReaction on September 10, 2010, 01:38:42 PM
I was at my GF's house and she had a couple playboys

and the reason why would be...?

News:

Honestly, I just read it for the articles