First time on a train, I find myself a bit confused.

Started by TiAvenger, June 10, 2008, 11:35:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TiAvenger

I thought trains were supposed to be a cheaper way to travel.  Although I am excited at the prospect of riding a train, I did the math, and it is the most expensive way to go.  The trip is from Visalia CA, to Turlock CA, roughly 130 miles. 
Its about a 2 hour drive and in monstergf's car (which I cant take because of her needing it)
29 mpg
20.17 in fuel cost @ 4.50 a gallon

Train is a 30 min bus ride (ick) and a 2 hour train ride
24.00 one way

or theres this option ...........














3 hours
125 vino
$13.50 @ 4.50 a gallon, scooter maddness  [evil]

http://www.mapquest.com/mq/7-7WsmtAL3

Grampa

Gaspar, Melchior and Balthasar kicked me out of the band..... they said I didnt fit the image they were trying to project. 

So I went solo.  -Me

Some people call 911..... some people are 911
-Marcus Luttrell


junior varsity

scooter+vino. nothing wrong with a little wine with your scoot.

(only kidding, don't get mad)

Mother

most of the time

trains are used to go farther than 130 miles


Gearhead_42

Quote from: Mother on June 10, 2008, 11:56:20 AM
most of the time

trains are used to go farther than 130 miles


Seriously.  That's less than two days commute.

Make her take vino, usurp the car.  ;D

Mother

Quote from: Gearhead_42 on June 10, 2008, 12:07:14 PM
Seriously.  That's less than two days commute.

Make her take vino, usurp the car.  ;D

?

that is less than a half day commute

that is like a 3 hour commute

TiAvenger

Quote from: Gearhead_42 on June 10, 2008, 12:07:14 PM
Seriously.  That's less than two days commute.

Make her take vino, usurp the car.  ;D

she lacks the proper license/ experience

Gearhead_42

Quote from: Mother on June 10, 2008, 12:12:58 PM
?

that is less than a half day commute

that is like a 3 hour commute

Man, I thought 75 miles a day was bad... seriously?  Mine is rural highway, so no traffic either...

Kyna

I looked into taking a train home for X-mas this year.  (Wisconsin to California) It will take over three days and cost about the same amount of money. Three days on a train seems a bit much for a first trip.  I hate flying so I've looked into it before and I've never found a train to actually be cheaper.  I haven't calculated out how much driving will cost, I figure by then gas will be even more expensive.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -Robert J. Hanlon

eviltwin

If you were a stuntman you'd take the vino down 99 the whole way [laugh]
We are 138

roy-nexus-6


LYD

130 miles, pssst no sweat  1.5 hours.  Haul @$$.  Ipod, or sirius radio.  If the weather is nice ride!!  [thumbsup]
RIP cdc

01 900 monster
01 748
02 900ss (trackbike)
12 1200s Multistrada

somegirl

The US doesn't really have the right infrastructure for trains to be a practical option most of the time.  Now in Europe or Japan it would be different.
Need help posting pictures?  Check out the photo FAQ.

KnightofNi

i've found the train to be cheap for trips within about 30 miles. most of the time it would take longer to take the train, but that's the trade off.

when going to NYC (around 120 mi) i have taken the train, bus, and driven/ridden. the bus (ghettohound) was the cheapest by far at $35 round trip. driving and amtrak were about the same after you figured in parking. all of those took around the same amt of time. if i had taken NJ transit it would have been around $40 round trip, but it would take at least 3 hrs longer with 3 transfers.
Life, alas is very drear. Up with the glass and down with the beer!
Quote from: RB on September 09, 2009, 05:31:47 AM
Seriously, when i am 800years old i want to rock like Lemmy! it is a religion that requires lots of determination, drugs, and Marshall stacks.

now with clavicle of steel (stainless) wrist o' steel (11/2011)