1100 EVO Claimed 100HP ???

Started by Mau, September 12, 2011, 11:44:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mau

Hi all,
I am the new owner of a 1100 EVO and even when I like the bike a lot, I can't avoid being dissapointed by its performance.  I know it is a 2V air cooled engine......but I was expecting a little more power as the advertising claimed 100 HP.

The latest Motorcycle-usa dyno test put out almost 87HP...however, another user reported only 83HP on his test.  Regardless the differences, I would call it and 85......not quite the 100HP Ducati claims.

How can Ducati get away with something like that?

I think the 796 outs about 78HP.

arai_speed


Mau

Thanks Arai, I understand.

Here is an explanaition I found:

Crank HP vs. True Rear Wheel HP
That's a tough one - and LONG....
The short?
Take crank HP, subtract 14.6% (please don't email me and ask - I won't answer - search SAE and old Yamaha), take that, and subtract around 10% to 15% and you'll get about True HP at rear wheel.
The actual formula contains a curve for power loss through gears and  there SHOULD be another curve for power lost in a tire (it's the majority of loss on a motorcycle....
Remember, too - that you are only likely to get a crank number from the manufacturer and that's probably a "good" one that the marketing department is providing... (sound of blowing up a marketing and sales balloon? :-)  That's not everybody - but it has happened - leaving names out! :-)


This formula yields about 76HP for the EVO......

Now I know...... ???

Slide Panda

Historically Ducs loose about 10% from the crank to the wheel. The first 848s folks tested were rated at 130bhp and put down 117 at the wheel - exactly a 10% loss.

So you can roughly assume you'll be getting around 90 on that 1100.

Numbers can vary from dyno to dyno and by atmospheric conditions, ambient temps etc etc. I know my 900 feels a lot more gutty on a cool fall afternoon than a hot humid summer day
-Throttle's on the right, so are the brakes.  Good luck.
- '00 M900S with all the farkles
- '08 KTM 690 StupidMoto
- '07 Triumph 675 Track bike.

Spidey

Are you coming from an I-4?  If so, 100 HP on the 2V aircooled twin feels really different b/c of the powerband.  If you're used to a top-end rush (which makes the bike feel fast and powerful), you're not gonna get it.  And because the powerband is relatively flat in comparison, you'll go fast on the Duc from low revs w/o realizing it.  

That said, it's not 100 RWHP. 
Occasionally AFM #702  My stuff:  The M1000SS, a mashed r6, Vino 125, the Blonde, some rugrats, yuppie cage, child molester van, bourbon.

bikepilot

Most all MFG's publish very optimistic HP figures.  You didn't think the BMW and Kawasaki 100cc liter bikes really made 200hp to the wheel or that the Buell's make 103 hp now did ya?  

Ducati used to be more realistic, but some time ago they figured out that it just made them look bad when squids compared numbers, so now their degree of optimism is bested only by Buell I think (buell claimed 103hp from a motor that'll do 80 flat on a dyno).

SP, most dyno operators apply an SAE correction factor which more or less takes into account temp, altitude etc.  They sometimes don't when its a dyno day and they are doing a ton of them though.
2009 XB12XT
2006 Monster 620 (wife's)
1997 TL1000S
1975 Kawasaki H1 Mach III
2001 CR250R (CO do-it-all bike)
2000 XR650R (dez racer)
2003 KX100 (wife's)
1994 DR250SE (wife's/my city commuter)

Duc Buz

Much like "claimed weights".  You really see this in the bicycle world, very generous.
11B4P (Ret) US Army
2003 620 Dark (Matte Silver)

Hellraising-vtec

I have an Evo and would love more top end power. Something about it topping at 130mph also depresses me. I love the bike but I still think it lacks some power

Buckethead

Quote from: Hellraising-vtec on September 12, 2011, 07:37:41 PM
I have an Evo and would love more top end power. Something about it topping at 130mph also depresses me. I love the bike but I still think it lacks some power


Damn, do I wish I could afford a 130 mph speeding ticket and the corresponding bump in my insurance prices.

Also, you DO realize that Ducati speedometers are notorious for being, um, "optimistic," yes?

[coffee]
Quote from: Jester on April 11, 2013, 07:29:35 AM
I can't wait until Marquez gets on his level and makes Jorge trip on his tampon string. 

Speeddog

My **** is rated at a claimed 12".
(If I start measuring at my belt).

It happens across all the manufacturers.
I worked for Yamaha in the 80's and 90's.
The 'claimed dry weight' of the bikes was always about 10% low.
- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~

Ohm3d

Quote from: Buckethead on September 12, 2011, 09:07:25 PM
Ducati speedometers are notorious for being, um, "optimistic," yes?


+1 LOL  [beer]

Mau

#11
Thanks for all the comments.  

Yes, I always had I4s and remember my 600cc sport bikes would be much faster.  Nevertheless, today I am over the speed rush I had 10 years ago and the Monster's power seems just enough to be fun while keeping me safe.  [Dolph]

BTW...What's the best way to increase the monster's HP?

thought

'10 SFS 1098
'11 M796 ABS - Sold
'05 SV650N - Sold

SDRider

Quote from: Mau on September 14, 2011, 09:33:47 AM
Thanks for all the comments.  

Yes, I always had I4s and remember my 600cc sport bikes would be much faster.  Nevertheless, today I am over the speed rush I had 10 years ago and the Monster's power seems just enough to be fun while keeping me safe.  [Dolph]

BTW...What's the best way to increase the monster's HP?

2014 Ducati Multistrada 1200 S
2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO (sold)

Raux

Port and Polish,Hugh compression pistons, Termi full exhaust with DP ECU, Powercommander V,
lightweight crank, rods, flywheel, wheels