Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

January 04, 2025, 01:23:03 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: No Registration with MSN emails
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: monster 620 bore increase  (Read 24729 times)
POCO LOCO
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 54


« on: September 08, 2015, 05:46:09 PM »

I own a 2006 Monster 620 Dark. Mods I have done so far is 14 tooth front sprocket, K& N air filter, Dan moto slip ons, i riidium plugs.I have not reflashed my ECU yet , because I hear that you can bump up displacement by swapping out 800 cylinders from a 2006 monster and slipping in  feracci pistons.Any opinions on this?
Logged
Speeddog
West Valley Flatlander
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14813


RIP Nicky


« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2015, 06:23:20 PM »

695/750/800 cylinders are all 88mm bore.
Basically the same though the dowel pin location on the base changed in ~'01-'02, so you'll have to watch that.

With your 620 crank (61.5mm stroke) that will get you 748cc.

Your cams are a little bit better than what was in the 750's.
So it'll then run a little better than a hi-comp 750.

That's not particularly spectacular, but it's better than what you have now.
Perhaps 6-8 HP more across the range.

Considering the cost of parts and labor, it may be more effective to slide in an 800 motor.
That would get you 10-15 HP more across the range, and a 6-speed trans as well.
Depends how much of it you're doing yourself.
Logged

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~
Duck-Stew
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9556


« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2015, 12:06:01 PM »

695/750/800 cylinders are all 88mm bore.
Basically the same though the dowel pin location on the base changed in ~'01-'02, so you'll have to watch that.

With your 620 crank (61.5mm stroke) that will get you 748cc.

Your cams are a little bit better than what was in the 750's.
So it'll then run a little better than a hi-comp 750.

That's not particularly spectacular, but it's better than what you have now.
Perhaps 6-8 HP more across the range.

Considering the cost of parts and labor, it may be more effective to slide in an 800 motor.
That would get you 10-15 HP more across the range, and a 6-speed trans as well.
Depends how much of it you're doing yourself.

'06 620 is already a 6-speed BTW Mr. Speeddog...  waytogo
Logged

Bike-less Portuguese immigrant enjoying life.
The ModFather
Duck Off
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1261


Monster Magnet


« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2015, 03:30:59 PM »

Considering the cost of parts and labor, it may be more effective to slide in an 800 motor.
That would get you 10-15 HP more across the range, and a 6-speed trans as well.
Depends how much of it you're doing yourself.

When my beloved 2005 Monster 620 engine gets to a point where some major engine work is required to keep it running this is what I'm-A gonna do!!
Logged

2005 S2R 800 Analog Motorcycles Custom Build
2007 Sport Classic 1000S
2008 848 Track Bike
2015 Diavel Dark - Sold
2005 Monster 620 Dark - Sold
Speeddog
West Valley Flatlander
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14813


RIP Nicky


« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2015, 03:37:27 PM »

'06 620 is already a 6-speed BTW Mr. Speeddog...  waytogo

Hmmm... I guess I had the way-back machine set to 2004.  laughingdp
Logged

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~
DarkMonster620
According to some, a bottomless pit eating machine
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 38054


Enjoying the ride


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2015, 06:05:31 PM »

'06 620 is already a 6-speed BTW Mr. Speeddog...  waytogo
'05 too . . . unless it was the Dark single disc . . . Grin
Logged

Carlos
I said I was smart, never that I had my shit together
Ducati is the pretty girl that can't walk in heels without stumbling. I still love her.
"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
koko64
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15715


« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2015, 10:56:44 AM »

Are there any considerations re combustion chamber shape and piston choice when doing this big bore upgrade to a 620? Are 620 and 750 combustion chambers shaped differently influencing choice of hi comp pistons?
Logged

2015 Scrambler 800
DarkMonster620
According to some, a bottomless pit eating machine
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 38054


Enjoying the ride


WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2015, 03:49:50 PM »

Are there any considerations re combustion chamber shape and piston choice when doing this big bore upgrade to a 620? Are 620 and 750 combustion chambers shaped differently influencing choice of hi comp pistons?
620 is has better flowing heads . . . you can get more if a pro is doing the work, but, reliability will/might become an issue if you go full HC . . .

Logged

Carlos
I said I was smart, never that I had my shit together
Ducati is the pretty girl that can't walk in heels without stumbling. I still love her.
"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
koko64
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15715


« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2015, 04:13:41 PM »

Has the 620 a tighter chamber? If so you think 11:1 pistons rather than 12:1 pistons to avoid piston to valve and piston to head clearance issues?
Logged

2015 Scrambler 800
DarkMonster620
According to some, a bottomless pit eating machine
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 38054


Enjoying the ride


WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2015, 04:43:50 PM »

Has the 620 a tighter chamber? If so you think 11:1 pistons rather than 12:1 pistons to avoid piston to valve and piston to head clearance issues?
just regular day to day use . . the 12:1 are just too hot for city riding if PO is gonna do lots of canyon riding and track time, then, yes, HC and some head work . . .

my M620 ran great until it didn't . . . with 10.5:1 OEM . . . faster than a few 750 locally
Logged

Carlos
I said I was smart, never that I had my shit together
Ducati is the pretty girl that can't walk in heels without stumbling. I still love her.
"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
POCO LOCO
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 54


« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2016, 12:28:01 PM »

695/750/800 cylinders are all 88mm bore.
Basically the same though the dowel pin location on the base changed in ~'01-'02, so you'll have to watch that.

With your 620 crank (61.5mm stroke) that will get you 748cc.

Your cams are a little bit better than what was in the 750's.
So it'll then run a little better than a hi-comp 750.

That's not particularly spectacular, but it's better than what you have now.
Perhaps 6-8 HP more across the range.
Considering the cost of parts and labor, it may be more effective to slide in an 800 motor.
That would get you 10-15 HP more across the range, and a 6-speed trans as well.
Depends how much of it you're doing yourself.
O.K. So what year cylinders, and off what size engine will I have to purchase to do this Monster 620 conversion ?
Logged
koko64
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15715


« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2016, 02:37:35 PM »

Be watching this with interest.
I was wondering about this (have a customer with an '06 620 Dark). Assuming the post 02 88mm cylinders are the same it looks like 03+ 88mm cylinders are ok from what Speeddog posted. I guess buying used cylinders in your part of the world is cheaper than boring and replating 620 cylinders? I don't even know if the 620 cylinders have enough material to do that, i.e. if they are small bore versions of 88mm cylinders. Sounds too like you need 10:1 -11:1 pistons with the 620 chamber rather than 12:1 for the 750 chamber which I assume is more open.
These guys will have to confirm.
 popcorn
Logged

2015 Scrambler 800
koko64
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15715


« Reply #12 on: June 04, 2016, 02:42:40 PM »

If you go with a hi comp 750 conversion, PCV and an open airbox, should be a decent performance gain. Iirc Darkmonster is looking at doing this so he might have some good info for you.
Logged

2015 Scrambler 800
DarkMonster620
According to some, a bottomless pit eating machine
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 38054


Enjoying the ride


WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 04, 2016, 02:44:06 PM »

IF and ONLY IF those cylinders fit the 620 crankcase I would then try to procure myself a set of said cylinders in order to install my 11:1 FBF pistons . . I would NOT have to redo my ECU, since, it would be able to handle it, sure, a reflash and dyno tune would be the best option but, in my side of the world, I don't have access to a bike dyno or tuning software . . . Since Ducati sells the cylinders with pistons  . . . I wanted the 750 cylinders

edit:
or, just get a set of 800 cylinders/piston and reflash ECU

Logged

Carlos
I said I was smart, never that I had my shit together
Ducati is the pretty girl that can't walk in heels without stumbling. I still love her.
"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
Speeddog
West Valley Flatlander
Flounder-Administrator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14813


RIP Nicky


« Reply #14 on: June 04, 2016, 11:17:27 PM »

I guess I missed the quick blast of posts last October.

Be watching this with interest.
I was wondering about this (have a customer with an '06 620 Dark). Assuming the post 02 88mm cylinders are the same it looks like 03+ 88mm cylinders are ok from what Speeddog posted. I guess buying used cylinders in your part of the world is cheaper than boring and replating 620 cylinders? I don't even know if the 620 cylinders have enough material to do that, i.e. if they are small bore versions of 88mm cylinders. Sounds too like you need 10:1 -11:1 pistons with the 620 chamber rather than 12:1 for the 750 chamber which I assume is more open.
These guys will have to confirm.
 popcorn

Are there any considerations re combustion chamber shape and piston choice when doing this big bore upgrade to a 620? Are 620 and 750 combustion chambers shaped differently influencing choice of hi comp pistons?

I don't know if there are any differences in the chambers between 620 and 750.
I suspect they're the same, as the valve part numbers are the same when comparing last year of 750 and first year of 620 ('02).
Cams are in the same spot, as are rockers, etc.
620 has slightly more lift on the cam, so they may have moved the valve seats.....
I wouldn't have moved the seats if I were in their shoes, so perhaps they did.  Undecided

I've got FBF 750 hi-comps and Mahle 91mm (makes a 750 into an 800) hi-comps, and neither dome is a particularly close fit in a 695/800 chamber.
And the fit of the squish areas aren't so flash either.
Which really annoys me, as they could have done it properly with a relatively tiny effort.
Mahle fits better, but still not as it should.
Perhaps they fit a 750 head better, but I'd be surprised.

800 and 900 valves are the same part numbers, at least for 8mm stem 800's.

I've compared a couple years of '02 and later 620/695/750/800 crankcase part numbers, and each individual year they're the same part numbers.
Can't compare cylinder part numbers, as OEM they come with pistons, which are different due to the different strokes.
From that, I'd say all '02 and later 620/695/750/800 cylinders will swap without issue.

You'll need to get the proper piston deck height to match whatever crank you run.
620 and 750 are same stroke, so that makes it a lot easier.
800 pistons are ~2.25mm shorter deck height than 620/750.
Logged

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1