i'm ok with using a different term to differentiate the low-speed practice.
berkeley university has done
a study that found the practice can be safe up to 50mph if the speed differential is less than 15mph. but that's in CA where it's been common practice. one could argue that the drivers there are used to it.
i'm not for setting speed limits. it should be up to the riders to use their judgement (i.e. helmets). personally i would not be comfortable, if the bill passes, zipping by cars at hi speed until said cars are used to bikes zipping by at hi speed.
any opposition other than rider safety?