Sprocket Ratio

Started by NAKID, April 27, 2016, 02:30:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

NAKID

So, just a thought. Stock setup for the M821 is 15/46 (3.07). Would there be a benefit in terms of rotating mass to drop to a 14/43 (3.07)?

I mean, I imagine the weight savings on the front sprocket would be very minimal, but what about the rear? And what are the implications for a chain that is shorter (due to the smaller diameters) in terms of wear? I mean, I can imagine it would lose about 2 teeth minimum over the stock set up.

Thoughts?
2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821

ducpainter

"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent."



stopintime

Compared to a wheel at 10-15 lbs or a tire at about 15 lbs, both much further out - I'd forget about the rotating weight savings.

In theory, maybe also to some degree in real life, smaller sprockets wear the chain faster.

I support mods, but I think you should otherwise  [thumbsup]

268,000 km/eighteen years - loving it

koko64

Is it over geared for your riding needs?
2015 Scrambler 800
2013 M1100 Evo

NAKID

Quote from: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM

I support mods, but I think you should otherwise  [thumbsup]



Not looking to do it in place of what I currently have. Just thinking for down the line when they need to be replaced.

Quote from: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM

In theory, maybe also to some degree in real life, smaller sprockets wear the chain faster.


I was thinking that too, one of the reasons I asked.

Quote from: ducpainter on April 27, 2016, 02:34:45 PM
Yes...too much. ;D

[laugh]

Quote from: koko64 on April 27, 2016, 02:43:10 PM
Is it over geared for your riding needs?

Not really. That's one of the reasons I wanted to keep the ratios the same.
2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821

cencalal

Smaller sprockets bring the chain closer to the swingarm, possibly causing a rub?

A hard anodized aluminum rear sprocket would be better - less rotating mass and unsprung weight.  They look nice too.

NAKID

Quote from: cencalal on April 27, 2016, 05:10:25 PM
Smaller sprockets bring the chain closer to the swingarm, possibly causing a rub?

A hard anodized aluminum rear sprocket would be better - less rotating mass and unsprung weight.  They look nice too.

I'm a commuter, going for longevity.
2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821

Charlie98

Quote from: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 05:33:40 PM
I'm a commuter, going for longevity.

If you are happy with your ratios, just stick with what you have, in steel.
Dennis

2014 MTS 1200S Pikes Peak
2013 M796 ABS
1993 XR650L (the Torque-a-Saurus)

Wherever you go, there you are...

Howie

You can save weight with a Supersprox or Superlite sprocket and still have steel teeth.  Will it make a notable difference?  Doubt it.

jduke