Sprocket Ratio

Started by NAKID, April 27, 2016, 02:30:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

NAKID

So, just a thought. Stock setup for the M821 is 15/46 (3.07). Would there be a benefit in terms of rotating mass to drop to a 14/43 (3.07)?

I mean, I imagine the weight savings on the front sprocket would be very minimal, but what about the rear? And what are the implications for a chain that is shorter (due to the smaller diameters) in terms of wear? I mean, I can imagine it would lose about 2 teeth minimum over the stock set up.

Thoughts?
2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821

ducpainter

"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent."



stopintime

Compared to a wheel at 10-15 lbs or a tire at about 15 lbs, both much further out - I'd forget about the rotating weight savings.

In theory, maybe also to some degree in real life, smaller sprockets wear the chain faster.

I support mods, but I think you should otherwise  [thumbsup]

252,000 km/seventeen years - loving it

koko64

Is it over geared for your riding needs?
2015 Scrambler 800

NAKID

Quote from: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM

I support mods, but I think you should otherwise  [thumbsup]



Not looking to do it in place of what I currently have. Just thinking for down the line when they need to be replaced.

Quote from: stopintime on April 27, 2016, 02:37:44 PM

In theory, maybe also to some degree in real life, smaller sprockets wear the chain faster.


I was thinking that too, one of the reasons I asked.

Quote from: ducpainter on April 27, 2016, 02:34:45 PM
Yes...too much. ;D

[laugh]

Quote from: koko64 on April 27, 2016, 02:43:10 PM
Is it over geared for your riding needs?

Not really. That's one of the reasons I wanted to keep the ratios the same.
2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821

cencalal

Smaller sprockets bring the chain closer to the swingarm, possibly causing a rub?

A hard anodized aluminum rear sprocket would be better - less rotating mass and unsprung weight.  They look nice too.

NAKID

Quote from: cencalal on April 27, 2016, 05:10:25 PM
Smaller sprockets bring the chain closer to the swingarm, possibly causing a rub?

A hard anodized aluminum rear sprocket would be better - less rotating mass and unsprung weight.  They look nice too.

I'm a commuter, going for longevity.
2005 S2R800
2006 S2R1000
2015 Monster 821

Charlie98

Quote from: NAKID on April 27, 2016, 05:33:40 PM
I'm a commuter, going for longevity.

If you are happy with your ratios, just stick with what you have, in steel.
Dennis

2013 M796 ABS
1993 XR650L (the Torque-a-Saurus)

Wherever you go, there you are...

Howie

You can save weight with a Supersprox or Superlite sprocket and still have steel teeth.  Will it make a notable difference?  Doubt it.

jduke