Reuseable Oil Filter

Started by He Man, December 09, 2009, 08:43:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

He Man

http://www.motorcycle.com/products/kp-engineerings-reusable-oil-filter-71983.html

Anyone have any experience with this? in an effort to go green and reduce waste, anything thats reuseable is not only environmentally friendly, but also saves you money in having to buy oil filters. Especially for you guys who change their oil as frequently 2,000 miles.

MonsterTom

This looks like a sweet filter assembly.  I particularly like the magnet at the bottom of the filter to trap metalic particles.  Any idea what it costs?

ducpainter

The ad says $120-$150 depending on finish and bike model
"Once you accept that a child on the autistic spectrum experiences the world in
 a completely different way than you, you will be open to understand how that
 perspective
    is even more amazing than yours."
    To realize the value of nine  months:
    Ask a mother who gave birth to a stillborn.
"Don't piss off old people The older we get, the less 'Life in Prison' is a deterrent."



cokey

I WIN
Quote from: my wifeOk babe I surrender to u.  U may work me out till I drop

Quote from: Timmy Tucker on February 27, 2011, 11:11:58 AM
About the goat...
His name was Bob, but the family called him BeelzeBob. 
make the beast with two backs goats.

JetTest

Looks like a clone of the Scott's reusable stainless steel filter. I think I paid $108 for my Scott's, delivered.

He Man

i was on scotts website too. they run 148 for duc filters. worth it i guess, especially at 15 an change. ive already gone through 4 filters.

erkishhorde

So... How does this type of thing get cleaned? I understand the cleaning of a re-useable air filter since you essentially back flow and push everything out, but this one...? Maybe I just don't get it because I don't understand the flow of oil in a filter. Does the oil go from the outside of the cloth into the middle or the opposite way? I thought it was inside to outside in which case I don't understand how you clean the particles out to re-use it.
ErkZ NOT in SLO w/ his '95 m900!
The end is in sight! Gotta buckle down and get to work!

Dietrich

The filter in the link is identicle to the Scotts.  I have one and it definitely flows from outside to inside.  I've cleaned mine about 4 or 5 times now.  I just soak it in some solvent, then hose it out with spray brake cleaner from the inside out (careful to not let the particles flow back into the middle of the filter section.).  Then I blow it out with compressed air.  There is always a fine collection of stuff on the magnet, and bigger stuff on the screen amongst the other fine stuff that is caught.  Seems to be working well for me.  Plus, it has fins, and I'm a sucker for anything with more fins.

corey

i've heard of problems regarding oil pressure with these extremely high flow filters... anyone else heard anything like that?
When all the land lays in ruin... And burnination has forsaken the countryside... Only one guy will remain... My money's on...

dlearl476

Quote from: JetTest on December 10, 2009, 03:46:36 AM
Looks like a clone of the Scott's reusable stainless steel filter. I think I paid $108 for my Scott's, delivered.

FWIW, I got a dozen Perf-Form oil filters for around $70.  Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of Scott's filter and run them on two bikes, my SprintST and my F650, but unless you do a LOT of miles, economy isn't the best selling point of a Scott's filter. 
Quote from: Dietrich on December 10, 2009, 09:21:26 AMPlus, it has fins, and I'm a sucker for anything with more fins.
Now you're talkin'!


Quote from: corey on December 10, 2009, 09:38:48 AM
i've heard of problems regarding oil pressure with these extremely high flow filters... anyone else heard anything like that?

No problems here, nor have I heard of any from several pals with Scott's and nearly a hundred thousand combined miles.

Mr Earl

The KP Engineering filter specs show a rating of 35 microns.  That's kinda big, IMO.  Presumably that's how they achieve high flow rates.  But what's the point of avoiding filter bypass if you accomplish it by not filtering very well?  I think I'd rather have a momentary bypass of unfiltered oil combined with high particulate retention for 99+% of engine operation, than no bypass and less retentive filtration.

For reference, the Amsoil Eao filters (no affiliation) list a 15-micron rating.
Leo Vince CF slip-ons, '01 SS900 fully adjustable Showa forks w/ST2 springs, rebuilt S4 shock w/Ohlins spring, 748 dog bone, Swatt clip-ons above the triple, Sargent seat, Duplicolor-Dark seat cowl, Rizoma grips, Techlusion TFI, SBK front fender, Evoluzione slave, BMC sport air filter, 14-tooth sprocket, Desmotimes caseguard, S2R side panels, Pantah belt covers, fake CRG LS mirrors, extra black zip-ties, right grip control imprint on tank, de-cannistered, Ducati Meccanica Bologna key ring

He Man

Quote from: Mr Earl on December 10, 2009, 06:20:05 PM
The KP Engineering filter specs show a rating of 35 microns.  That's kinda big, IMO.  Presumably that's how they achieve high flow rates.  But what's the point of avoiding filter bypass if you accomplish it by not filtering very well?  I think I'd rather have a momentary bypass of unfiltered oil combined with high particulate retention for 99+% of engine operation, than no bypass and less retentive filtration.

For reference, the Amsoil Eao filters (no affiliation) list a 15-micron rating.

K&N filters are rated at 25microns.
The scotts and AP both state that they filter down to 35micron absolute.
Amsoil Eao filters seem to be the oddity, being almost too good.

now what kind of contaminants in our oil are smaller than 35 microns and whats the % by voulme of it in a normal engine?

Popeye the Sailor

Quote from: He Man on December 10, 2009, 07:13:32 PM
K&N filters are rated at 25microns.
The scotts and AP both state that they filter down to 35micron absolute.
Amsoil Eao filters seem to be the oddity, being almost too good.

now what kind of contaminants in our oil are smaller than 35 microns and whats the % by voulme of it in a normal engine?

And let's not skip the important question-do contaminants that small matter to the motor?
If the state had not cut funding for the mental institutions, this project could never have happened.

erkishhorde

Quote from: He Man on December 10, 2009, 07:13:32 PM
K&N filters are rated at 25microns.
The scotts and AP both state that they filter down to 35micron absolute.
Amsoil Eao filters seem to be the oddity, being almost too good.

now what kind of contaminants in our oil are smaller than 35 microns and whats the % by voulme of it in a normal engine?

Is that K&N size for the normal K&N filter? Do they even make a re-useable one? I'm just curious.
ErkZ NOT in SLO w/ his '95 m900!
The end is in sight! Gotta buckle down and get to work!

LowThudd

I wouldn't think that it would be a green way to go if solvent and brake cleaner are required to clean them. Any Autozone or similar will take your old filter and recycle it, which is the greanest way to go. As far as ease of use, my bike(86 radian) REQUIRES that the filter be taken apart and reassembled, which to me is a PITA. I would much rather have the standard screw on filter. As far as cost, it won't pay for it's self for 10-15 oil changes(including solvent and brake cleaner) which equates to 20,000-@40,000 miles. That's alot of work and expense with very little return unless it filtered finer material.  Just MHO.