JHP Ducati 2V SBK 1088 cc (120 hp, 300lb)

Started by junior varsity, February 16, 2011, 05:55:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TAftonomos

no no!  That wasn't intended, please don't take it that way. 

I've been down the road I described MANY times, I just won't let it happen again.

junior varsity

i know, and no offense taken!  kind of a tongue in cheek thing over here for me seeing in the garage!

It would be alive and running by now had I not invested in a real heap of a 900 to practice my fixxer-upper skills.

DoubleEagle

My 1098 R weighs 363 lbs. dry @ 175 RWHP w, full race Termi and DP ECU

That's 2.07 lbs. per 1 hp

The JHP bike is 2.5 lbs. per 1 hp

I bet the JHP bike costs more than my R cost new ,which was MSRP $40,000 +tax and fees.

Dolph    :)
'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "

Triple J

Quote from: DoubleEagle on February 21, 2011, 07:19:30 PM
My 1098 R weighs 363 lbs. dry @ 175 RWHP w, full race Termi and DP ECU

Out of curiosity have you verified that weight?  ;)

TAftonomos

It's more fun to ride a slow bike fast, than a fast bike slow.

DoubleEagle

Quote from: Triple J on February 21, 2011, 08:46:21 PM
Out of curiosity have you verified that weight?  ;)
No,

I take Ducati's word on that.

Dolph       [moto]
'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "

DoubleEagle

Quote from: TAftonomos on February 21, 2011, 09:07:53 PM
It's more fun to ride a slow bike fast, than a fast bike slow.
Who rides a fast bike slow ?

Dolph     [moto]     
'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "

junior varsity

Quote from: DoubleEagle on February 21, 2011, 10:13:22 PM
Who rides a fast bike slow ?

Dolph     [moto]     

more people than you'd imagine. (but they simply "NEED" that much power!)

DoubleEagle

Quote from: a m on February 21, 2011, 10:40:14 PM
more people than you'd imagine. (but they simply "NEED" that much power!)
I'm sure there are those that can't put that much power to good use ....I'm not one of them.

I ride to the edge ...not sayin' there aren't faster riders on the road.

Dolph     [moto]
'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "

Kopfjager

Quote from: DoubleEagle on February 21, 2011, 07:19:30 PM
My 1098 R weighs 363 lbs. dry @ 175 RWHP w, full race Termi and DP ECU

That's 2.07 lbs. per 1 hp

The JHP bike is 2.5 lbs. per 1 hp

I bet the JHP bike costs more than my R cost new ,which was MSRP $40,000 +tax and fees.

Dolph    :)

Wet weight, we don't drive them dry. 1 gallon of gas weighs (6lbs) 4qts of oil (?) plus battery. Now do the math.
Woohoohoohoo! Two personal records! For breath holding and number of sharks shot in the face.

DoubleEagle

Quote from: kopfjäger on February 22, 2011, 12:52:05 AM
Wet weight, we don't drive them dry. 1 gallon of gas weighs (6lbs) 4qts of oil (?) plus battery. Now do the math.
Isn't the JHP bike weight quoted Dry ?

Dolph     [moto]
'08 Ducati 1098 R    '09 BMW K 1300 GT   '10 BMW S 1000 RR

Shortest sentence...." I am "   Longest sentence ... " I Do "

zooom

Quote from: DoubleEagle on February 22, 2011, 01:41:16 AM
Isn't the JHP bike weight quoted Dry ?


knowing Douglas the way I do, if it is "dry", that means without gas in it, otherwise ready to go.
99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T

Triple J

#72
Quote from: DoubleEagle on February 21, 2011, 10:09:55 PM
No,

I take Ducati's word on that.

Dolph       [moto]

You should try to get a real world weight. I'm not bagging on your R...it is definitely a light bike. But Ducati is very optimistic in their weights (as Cycleworld proved with the MTS1200 recently), and their definition of dry likely doesn't even include a battery being in the bike.

Besides all that, I'd still take a 120hp 320lb (wet) bike over a 170 hp 400 lb (wet) bike. It should be significantly quicker handling due to the much lower weight.  [thumbsup]

derby

Quote from: Triple J on February 22, 2011, 08:27:34 AM

Besides all that, I'd still take a 120hp 320lb (wet) bike over a 170 hp 400 lb (wet) bike. It should be significantly quicker handling due to the much lower weight.  [thumbsup]

also, you can make a fat bike scoot w/ more power, but you can't hide that weight from the brakes.
-- derby

'07 Suz GSX-R750

Retired rides: '05 Duc Monster S4R, '99 Yam YZF-R1, '98 Hon CBR600F3, '97 Suz GSX-R750, '96 Hon CBR600F3, '94 Hon CBR600F2, '91 Hon Hawk GT, '91 Yam YSR-50, '87 Yam YSR-50

click here for info about my avatar

Travman

#74
The manufacturers are very optimistic about their weight and hp/torque ratings.  I like Motorcycle Consumer News because they do their own measurements. They have an 2008 1098S listed at 434 lbs wet with 138 rwhp.