Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

January 26, 2025, 01:30:35 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Questions about which used Monster may be best  (Read 2637 times)
BTF/PTM
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« on: November 25, 2013, 11:29:34 AM »

Hi everyone,

My first question for the forum is, which sub-forum here is best for information regarding rideability, suitability and longevity of the various Monsters?  I've begun to use the search key, but I figured I'd ask yall to see if I could narrow it down.  Thanks  =)
« Last Edit: November 26, 2013, 03:56:31 AM by BTF/PTM » Logged
ChrisK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1025



« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2013, 11:40:16 AM »

I'm thinking right here in the General Forum is the place to ask those questions.
Logged

1998 M900
2007 CBR600RR Track Bike
1982 Virago 920 Cafe/Fighter Project
1980 Lambretta Moped
Supra Boats enthusiast

"There is no minimum."  - some guy.
Blackout
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1192



« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2013, 03:36:00 PM »

Well, I've got a 2003 800ie with just under 70K trouble free miles but she's about shot now. Needs an engine.
Logged

2003 Ducati Monster 800
2005 Triumph Speed Triple 1050
2003 Honda CR250
2008 KTM 990 SuperDuke
koko64
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 15736


« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2013, 04:03:45 PM »

Of the older 2 valvers the 2000-2001 900ie S models are excellent. The 2000 S model has an Ohlins rear shock standard, the 2001 model has a stronger chassis. Good, reliable street motors with earlier, more easily tunable efi, air cooled simplicity. Cheap and relatively easy maintenance too.

The S4R and S4Rs models have a ton more power up top, but are more expensive to maintain. All you'll ever need for the street.
A good maintenance history is important.

Good luck.
Logged

2015 Scrambler 800
SpikeC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548


Spike in PDX


« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2013, 04:57:20 PM »

 I think a good first step is deciding just what you want in a bike, and what you intend on doing with it.
Logged

Spike Cornelius
  PDX
   2009 M1100S Assorted blingy odds and ends(now gone)
2008 Bimota DB5R  woo-Hoo!
   1965 T100SC
the_Journeyman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9181


Molly & Syreena, the Italian mistresses


« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2013, 07:23:34 PM »

I've got a 1999 (carbs) with almost 40,000 miles on out.  Outside of basic maintenance stuff, I've only replaced about $150 work of stuff.  What I've replaced:  Carb diaphragms, ($60ish for the pair, needle jets (can't remember, wasn't terrible), and the battery to frame ground cable.  I've not even replaced the clutch yet.

JM
Logged

Got Torque?
ADULT TRUTHS

10. Bad decisions make good stories.
BTF/PTM
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2013, 03:49:13 AM »

Thanks guys!!

Already some great information, so I'll be a bit more detailed since this is the right place to ask.

For starters, due to my own personal preference, I've been looking at S*R models for the adjustable suspension and the single-sided-swingarm models.  

Also trying to compare apples to apples as much as possible, I've done some reading about the S2R1000 versus the S4R.  It really seems like the S2R1000 is a more suitable street and day-ride bike than the S4R, it seems like the 4 needs to spend all its time wound up high to take advantage of the power.  I've also read that the 2 has a more usable torque band as a result of not being so high strung.  The bike I end up with will be used mostly for road and spirited twisty roads, with occasional track days, so something with a usable power band is important.

Another question for the experts is, in regard to any used Monster, assuming proper maintenance and having been well cared for, is a bike with 10-15k miles on it a safe bet mechanically?  It sounds like it is, hearing what you guys have said about bikes that finally after 40k miles need a fresh engine.  That's another reason that I've read a bit more about the S2R1000, the fact that its engine is (based on the reviews) based on the very well-proven, robust engine layout that's been in use forever.

Are there any folks here who can vouch for the S*R models?  Anyone who wouldn't vouch for them?

I'm sure I'll have more questions later, but that's enough for now.  Thanks again, guys, all feedback is welcome!

P.S. - title changed to something more relevant

« Last Edit: November 26, 2013, 03:55:37 AM by BTF/PTM » Logged
zooom
wishing I had some colorful enough tights for my
Post Whore
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11905


when your gas is natural and has a name...


« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2013, 04:28:24 AM »

I think a good first step is deciding just what you want in a bike, and what you intend on doing with it.

+1

based on your above response though, my .02 ( even though aethestically it isn't what you want) is to find an 03 M1000 S and ride the ever loving hell out of it in all capacities.
Logged

99 Cagiva Gran Canyon-"FOR SALE", PM for details.
98 Monster 900(trackpregnant dog-soon to be made my Fiancee's upgrade streetbike)
2010 KTM 990 SM-T
the_Journeyman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9181


Molly & Syreena, the Italian mistresses


« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2013, 05:59:31 AM »

Also trying to compare apples to apples as much as possible, I've done some reading about the S2R1000 versus the S4R.  It really seems like the S2R1000 is a more suitable street and day-ride bike than the S4R, it seems like the 4 needs to spend all its time wound up high to take advantage of the power. 

The S4R & S4RS still make plenty of power across the band.  However, they are 4-valve with more expensive maintenance.  They're still both v-twins with a nice smooth torque curve.  The S2R1000 or M1000 will make plenty of power and cost less to maintain overall.


Another question for the experts is, in regard to any used Monster, assuming proper maintenance and having been well cared for, is a bike with 10-15k miles on it a safe bet mechanically?

I bought my M750 with 13,000 miles on it.  It's been fine mechanically, motor has never needed to be opened up.  I would say, if you can get one with service records, replace any rubber bits (tires, belts mostly) that are over 2 years old you'll be fine from a mechanical standpoint.

JM
Logged

Got Torque?
ADULT TRUTHS

10. Bad decisions make good stories.
Privateer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2248


God created Ducati to train the faithful.


WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2013, 06:23:13 AM »

Another question for the experts is, in regard to any used Monster, assuming proper maintenance and having been well cared for, is a bike with 10-15k miles on it a safe bet mechanically?  It sounds like it is, hearing what you guys have said about bikes that finally after 40k miles need a fresh engine.  That's another reason that I've read a bit more about the S2R1000, the fact that its engine is (based on the reviews) based on the very well-proven, robust engine layout that's been in use forever.

new engine after 40k?  I'm way over due, if that's the case.



Other than consumable parts, the engine has been fine.  The last valve check it only needed 1 shim.


Electricals is another story.  My pops always says Ducati has genius mechanical engineers and C+ electrical engineers (he's an electrical engineer).
Logged

My fast lap is your sighting lap.
Ak1nza
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 74


« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2013, 09:14:46 AM »

I upgraded from an 06 S2R800 to an 07 S4RS.  I loved my S2R for the city, but I think the additional power of the S2R 1000 and the adjustable suspension would have made it even better specifically on the highway to get to the twisties.  

You don't need to get the S4R/RS to a high rpm to get rideability out of it.  It's has an enormous amount of torque down low.  Both bikes will have more useable power than you will ever need for the streets, twisties, and the occasional track day.

If you're deciding between the these two models in particular I would think about the maintenance differences between a 2 valve air cooled vs a 4 valve water cooled engine.  There's more to maintain on the S4R/RS than the S2R and each major maintenance interval will take more time.  The S4R/RS will be more expensive to maintain as a function of the additional parts.

I think you'd be happy with either.  I would definitely vouch for either bike.  

One thing to note: both bikes have plastic/nylon tanks which will expand over time with the use of ethanol based gasoline.  I've Caswell coated both my bikes and haven't had any further expanding problems.  It's a prudent question (along with other major servicing such as belts and valves, etc) to ask when you are looking at potential purchases whether the tank has been replaced, when, and if it was coated.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2013, 09:17:17 AM by Ak1nza » Logged

-----------------------------------
2006 S2R800 Dark - SOLD
2007 S4RS
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2013, 09:21:15 AM »

One thing to note: both bikes have plastic/nylon tanks which will expand over time with the use of ethanol based gasoline.  I've Caswell coated both my bikes and haven't had any further expanding problems.  It's a prudent question (along with other major servicing such as belts and valves, etc) to ask when you are looking at potential purchases whether the tank has been replaced, when, and if it was coated.

Big +1

S2R1000 all the way.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
BTF/PTM
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2013, 09:39:58 AM »

Just another chance to toss a 'thank you' into the mix again.  Thanks a ton, guys, this is fantastic info.

One advantage of looking for a bike in Germany is that paperwork is very thorough, thanks to their equivalent of the DOT (the TUV, their vehicle safety department).

I just came from looking at a 2004 S4R with 17,000km on it (about 11k miles), black on black.  Really sexy bike, as mentioned the fluids and belts and valves have been properly serviced (paperwork available).  Oh, and all three keys are there as well.  The VIN's confused me some, the VIN for the frame and the engine are very different patterns, and neither VIN matched the VIN decoder I found with a google search, but that's another post, I suppose.
 
Tomorrow I'm goin to look at an S2R1000, another S4R and a couple other Monsters.

Thanks again!!  Feel free to keep it coming  waytogo
« Last Edit: November 26, 2013, 01:37:35 PM by BTF/PTM » Logged
TitanMonsterS4R
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1740


Yup, it's supposed to sound like that....


« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2013, 01:50:03 PM »

One thing to note: both bikes have plastic/nylon tanks which will expand over time with the use of ethanol based gasoline.  I've Caswell coated both my bikes and haven't had any further expanding problems.  It's a prudent question (along with other major servicing such as belts and valves, etc) to ask when you are looking at potential purchases whether the tank has been replaced, when, and if it was coated.

The S4R had a metal tank until the 2007 model.
Logged

06 Monster S4R - Red/Black Final Edition
duccarlos
Local Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7994



WWW
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2013, 01:53:02 PM »

It's also a mute point since it's being sold in Europe. IIRC ethanol is still not mandatory on that side of the world.
Logged

my keyboard just served me with paternity suit.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1