Ducati Monster Forum

powered by:

February 13, 2025, 03:45:54 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Tapatalk users...click me
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  



Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Monster 796 vs. Monster 1100  (Read 13404 times)
Rob Ray
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


« on: November 18, 2010, 01:26:05 PM »

OK....I had about decided on an 1100 as my local dealer has some in stock and is hesitant to get a 796 until he sells some of his remaining 696s and 1100s....but....

The 796 may be just what I need.  I think I may like the slipper clutch better than the dry clutch and I've read that the 796 getsbetter gas milage than the 1100 or the 696.  Also, I believe that all 2011 monsters will have ABS at no additional charge.

I guess I'll drive 3 hours this weekend to look at a 796 at another dealer.

Any other reasons to pick one of these over the other?

Looking forward to your input!
Rob Ray
Logged
Raux
Guest
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 02:09:03 PM »

get a 1100 Evo

you get everything
Logged
Dave R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 410



WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2010, 04:19:51 PM »

The 796 is a great choice...  very predictable power delivery, nice package overall.  There are probably deals on 2010 1100's as well but I do like that motor in the 796!!
Logged

Dave R
Seattle Used Bikes
SALES - SERVICE - ACCESSORIES - PARTS
Facebook
Web
Veloce-Fino
Wiggle-Jiggle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513


Bike sold - But I'm still lurking.


« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2010, 04:50:00 PM »

get a 1100 Evo

you get everything

+1 if you have the $$ and want the best of everything, get an 1100evo.
Logged

Is this thing on?
matt922
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 187


« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2010, 05:34:50 PM »

i much prefer the exhaust on the 1100evo.

of course the 1100 will get worse mpg, but i'm sure it won't be so buzzy at highway rpms(if you do a bit of interstate ?).  If you don't want the extra power and marginally worse mpg, then by all means go for the 796(i'd love one myself).
Logged
mattc7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 372


« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2010, 05:57:23 PM »

the mpg differences on any of these isn't as different as you're making it out to be.  we're talking maybe 10 miles more to a tank, if that.
Logged
the_Journeyman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9181


Molly & Syreena, the Italian mistresses


« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2010, 06:17:28 PM »

The 695 is like an improved version of my M750.  More HP, a little less torque, complete with fuel injection and probably better suspension and at least as stiff of a frame.

I've had plenty of serious fun with my M750.  So long as you're not expecting to do 'Busa style 150MPH+ roll-ons on the highway, you'll probably be just fine on the 695.  The M750 handles surprisingly well has lots of torque for the twisties.  I'm sure you'll find the M695 similar.

JM
Logged

Got Torque?
ADULT TRUTHS

10. Bad decisions make good stories.
jvax
in the land of the rising sun
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 283



« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2010, 06:21:52 PM »

The 695 is like an improved version of my M750.  More HP, a little less torque, complete with fuel injection and probably better suspension and at least as stiff of a frame.

I've had plenty of serious fun with my M750.  So long as you're not expecting to do 'Busa style 150MPH+ roll-ons on the highway, you'll probably be just fine on the 695.  The M750 handles surprisingly well has lots of torque for the twisties.  I'm sure you'll find the M695 similar.

JM
I'm lost here...  Care to clarify how your reply answers the OP's question?  No offense intended.  Thanks.
Logged

'08 R1200GS
'10 M796 ABS Black (Sold)
jvax
in the land of the rising sun
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 283



« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2010, 06:24:08 PM »

of course the 1100 will get worse mpg, but i'm sure it won't be so buzzy at highway rpms(if you do a bit of interstate ?).  If you don't want the extra power and marginally worse mpg, then by all means go for the 796(i'd love one myself).
FYI - the 796 turned out to be not buzzy at all.  At 6th, 4000rpm puts me at roughly 80mph, which is my favorite and most confortable cruising speed, winds and all things considered.
Logged

'08 R1200GS
'10 M796 ABS Black (Sold)
ungeheuer
ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20827


Often wrong. Never in doubt.


WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2010, 06:28:23 PM »

Simple equation really.

M1100 costs more and makes more power.  M796 is less expensive and goes less hard.  

Who's in charge of what you ride?  Your wallet or your adrenalin gland  Evil ??
Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE


Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2
jvax
in the land of the rising sun
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 283



« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2010, 06:32:46 PM »

If you have the cash and can wait, get the 1100evo.  More power, ABS, DTC, the whole deal.

Otherwise, get a 2010 796 ABS, you won't regret it.

<personal_opinion>
I said 2010 because it has Showa front forks, which I prefer to the Marzocchi's on the 2011 model.
</personal_opinion>
Logged

'08 R1200GS
'10 M796 ABS Black (Sold)
the_Journeyman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9181


Molly & Syreena, the Italian mistresses


« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2010, 06:39:21 PM »

I'm lost here...  Care to clarify how your reply answers the OP's question?  No offense intended.  Thanks.

The 695 is from strictly a numbers view a fuel injected version of my M750.  Similar frame, similar power, but the 695 is injected.  Therefore, my experiences I mentioned should be similar to the 695 as far as handling and highway riding.

JM
Logged

Got Torque?
ADULT TRUTHS

10. Bad decisions make good stories.
jvax
in the land of the rising sun
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 283



« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2010, 06:50:43 PM »

The 695 is from strictly a numbers view a fuel injected version of my M750.  Similar frame, similar power, but the 695 is injected.  Therefore, my experiences I mentioned should be similar to the 695 as far as handling and highway riding.

JM

Thanks JM.

The OP however was asking for a comparison between Monster 796 vs. Monster 1100, not 695 and 750.
Or did you mean to offer your comparison of 695 vs 750 as an analogy to 796 vs 1100?

Logged

'08 R1200GS
'10 M796 ABS Black (Sold)
matt922
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 187


« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2010, 07:32:02 PM »

FYI - the 796 turned out to be not buzzy at all.  At 6th, 4000rpm puts me at roughly 80mph, which is my favorite and most confortable cruising speed, winds and all things considered.

even more better

Logged
ungeheuer
ɹǝʌO d∩ uıɐןɐɹʇsn∀
Local Moderator
Post Whore
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20827


Often wrong. Never in doubt.


WWW
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2010, 10:43:22 PM »

<personal_opinion>
I said 2010 because it has Showa front forks, which I prefer to the Marzocchi's on the 2011 model.
</personal_opinion>
Not doubting your right to an opinion in any way, you are of course entitled to hold this view.  I'm just wondering how you know this?  Have you ridden the Marzocchi M796?
Logged

Ducati 1100S Monster Ducati 1260ST Multistrada + Moto Guzzi Griso 1200SE


Previously: Ducati1200SMultistradaDucatiMonster696DucatiSD900MotoMorini31/2
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.1.1